50 Shades of Feminine

Embrace - that's what Jaanu taught us. What is it that we're really embracing? Is it a single thing that we need to embrace? Or would Einstein suggest a wave.

Is the embrace just a hug? Or something that surrounds us when there is a realization. Is there a feminine and masculine way to the embrace?

Can feminine be bolted down to attractive, kind and motherly? And masculine to just the opposite. Or are there more shades to it?

Timid, rule-bound, risk-averse - is it feminine or a (hu)man definition/want? Perhaps femininity doesn't fear boundaries. Perhaps it creates them. Not as walls...

But as invitations. It seems perfectly capable of living with both the rule and the rule-breaker. It respects the boundary and probably embraces the rare soul worthy of crossing the boundary.

What happens to us when we don't embrace? And try to write rules to bring it in line without cherishing the complexity. Rules are not what (hu)manity is all about. True masculine savors the shades. What if shades are ignored?

Sena Speaks: It has to be shades